Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| assemblage_epoque_d_uruk_archaique [2015/10/22 13:07] – lafont | assemblage_epoque_d_uruk_archaique [2017/03/31 09:47] (current) – gombert | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| * Butterlin P. 2010, [[http:// | * Butterlin P. 2010, [[http:// | ||
| * Faivre X. 2009, [[http:// | * Faivre X. 2009, [[http:// | ||
| - | * Van Ess M. 2012, « Stiftmosaik », RlA 13 3/ | ||
| * Forest J.D. (1987), | * Forest J.D. (1987), | ||
| * Sürenhagen D. (1986), « The dry farming belt: The Uruk period andsubsequent developments ». In H. Weiss (ed.) The Origins of Cities in Dry-Farming Syria and Mesopotamia in the Third Millennium B.C., Guilford, Four Quarters, p. 7-43. | * Sürenhagen D. (1986), « The dry farming belt: The Uruk period andsubsequent developments ». In H. Weiss (ed.) The Origins of Cities in Dry-Farming Syria and Mesopotamia in the Third Millennium B.C., Guilford, Four Quarters, p. 7-43. | ||
| * Suter C.E. 2014, « Human, Divine or Both? The Uruk Vase and the Problem of Ambiguity in Early Mesopotamian Visual Arts », in M. Feldman et B. Brown (éd.), Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, p. 545-568. | * Suter C.E. 2014, « Human, Divine or Both? The Uruk Vase and the Problem of Ambiguity in Early Mesopotamian Visual Arts », in M. Feldman et B. Brown (éd.), Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, p. 545-568. | ||
| + | * Van Ess M. 2012, « Stiftmosaik », RlA 13 3/ | ||
| * Van Ess M. 2013, « Die Technik der Tonstiftmosaiken », Uruk-5000 Jahre Megacity, catalogue d’exposition, | * Van Ess M. 2013, « Die Technik der Tonstiftmosaiken », Uruk-5000 Jahre Megacity, catalogue d’exposition, | ||
| + | Page prepared by A.T. | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| //Return to [[Assemblages for Different Periods]]// | //Return to [[Assemblages for Different Periods]]// | ||
